<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Brazil's Misery Index Drops 2%: 25% Still Live Below Poverty Line</title>
		<description>Comments for Brazil's Misery Index Drops 2%: 25% Still Live Below Poverty Line at http://www.brazzilmag.com , comment 0 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:11:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>A SHAME TO YOUR GOVERNMENT....</title>
			<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/4980/1/#pc_2070</link>
			<description>


....so proud of having 25 % of the population OR 46 millions citizens making less than US$ 51.- per month !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Guest</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 03:38:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Doubtful numbers !!!!!!</title>
			<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/4980/1/#pc_2065</link>
			<description>
The wealthy have invested their money in the stock market, or in short  time deposits providing very high interests rate, or in real estate.

The return on these investments have been far higher that the increase in your basic minimum salary that anyway millions and millions of citizens dont even earn.

Simple maths would demonstrate that  the wealth inequality has not been reduced.

Furthermore your poverty line is trunked too, because your currency increased, making more dollars, and this explains your apparent reduction in poverty.

Finally, using US$ 51.- per month to determine if one is poor or not is a true SHAME.

No doubt you could put the number at US$ 40.- per month and you would have a lower percentage of poverty.

Why not US$ 20.- and your poverty rate would still be 10 % or whatever.

LAMENTABLE to use US$ 51.- per month to determine the poverty line. The amount is below the cost of 1 of your basic basket !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  - Guest</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 03:35:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
