Comments for Brazil Bans YouTube. All to Prevent Hot Video from Being Seen at http://www.brazzilmag.com , comment 0 to 7 out of 7 comments http://www.brazzilmag.com Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:19:45 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/7747/54/#pc_7781 I am sorry ... I read the whole thing again (and one interview she gave elsewhere) and I understood it better - the lovers sued YouTube ... ridiculous. It brings up a lot of questions now, about their integrity. Is it about money? Publicity? Or what? They could have just smiled and said 'yes, we are happy and in love and celebrating it'. This story of 'invasion of privacy' when they were doing the good, the bad and the beautiful in public? Come on! Give me a break. Now, after the romantic impression they brought to me I am just disgusted about them. They are full of BS! Rent a motel room next time, fools! - Cesar Brauer Sun, 11 Mar 2007 09:21:00 +0100 http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/7747/54/#pc_7779 It's really a pitty that such retrograde legal stuff bans scenes like this, beautiful love making. Interesting is that anyone can see horrible violence and people saying terrible things, even about Buddhists! But these 2 lovers in peace and being healthy and happy, no, can't be seen. I think they don't want people to learn what happiness is. Unless they can turn it into porn and profit, selling it, it can't be seen? Ridiculous. Besides, I am proud of these lovers ... beautiful happy people. - Cesar Brauer Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:23:37 +0100 http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/7747/54/#pc_6433 There's also something funny about all this mess... The health secretary of the state of Rio Grande do Sul (in the south of Brazil) has made a parody video (that can only be viewed on You Tube) with the goal of educate about the dengue fever, a virus which can by hosted by the Aedes aegypti, a mosquito specie found at the state. Escala, the advertising agency that produced the video, claims that they want to take advantage of the viral marketing. Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsegA8ijcNQ - Mengas Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:06:01 +0100 http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/7747/54/#pc_6409 that's brazil alltheway. The gov't. here decides on what people have access to, a true absurdity. The brazilian gov't. is starting to resemble the old U.S.S.R! - bo Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:27:31 +0100 http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/7747/54/#pc_6403 Why the ruling ?, the law everywhere has ruled if you are in public you have no legal expectation of privacy, hence all the street cameras and listenning devices in the U.K. and the states for example, etc.. - alltheway Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:06:05 +0100 http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/7747/54/#pc_6401 Hey we noticed a MASSIVE rise in traffic from Brasil on www.sumo.tv , no doubt from the failing of youtube.com, plus of course we can get people on TV in brasil instead of just being "famous" online We too were cited in a Brasilian court order but resolved it with all parties very amicably and to their satisfaction way back in last year. - adam Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:50:33 +0100 http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/7747/54/#pc_6397 I raised some questions about this in my blog (in portuguese): http://quantocustalafora.blogspot.com/2007/01/youtube-censurado.html I see a problem of jurisdiction in that decision. Youtube, Inc. was sued in september, before being bought by Google and before having relations with Brazil. That sounds very dangerous. I hope it doesn't stand. - bowman Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:40:59 +0100