<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Brazil Puts Nukes on Fast Track and Vows to Build 60 Nuclear Plants</title>
		<description>Comments for Brazil Puts Nukes on Fast Track and Vows to Build 60 Nuclear Plants at http://www.brazzilmag.com , comment 0 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:43:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Brazil Puts Nukes on Fast Track and Vows to Build 60 Nuclear Plants </title>
			<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/9912/1/#pc_17096</link>
			<description>IMHO, we have to set a higher target. 60 is very low. I suggest we increase it to 120.
All objections overruled ! - João da Silva</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:14:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>But...but...but.....</title>
			<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/9912/1/#pc_17088</link>
			<description>....is Brazil not full of oil ??????????????????

8 billion  barrels of oil here
3 billion  barrels of oil there
and up to 50 billion more...if you read carefully the news and estimates  !!!!!!!


Or is it WATER YOU FOUND....TO COOL YOUR NEXT 60 Nuclear Plants ?????????



 :D ;D - CH.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:57:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/9912/1/#pc_17074</link>
			<description>Economically nuclear electrical plants are foolishness since the cost in energy intensive steel and concrete plus other more exotic materials makes nuclear the most expensive per kilowatt hour electricity there is.  There is something to the idea that it's attractive for baseline generation but with Brasil's many upcoming opportunities for co generation from sugar cane bagasse I have to doubt it's the best economic alternative for that either.  The only country where building more nukes is not in doubt is France where they have no other choices.  In the United States even permitted and approved plants are not being built due to the enormous and still riseing cost of construction and storage of spent fuel.

Just few more nukes could easily supply Brasil with sufficient materials for weaponry; 50 or 60 is costly overkill.

dewolfe - john dolph</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:51:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nuclear energy</title>
			<link>http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/9912/1/#pc_17073</link>
			<description>I just hope the storage facilities are installed properly.  It would be of great benefit to Brasil to have these plants, they can provide clean energy and produce more efficient energy.  The problem, however is the extreme storage and facility costs associated with it. - Dona</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:22:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
