Brazil - Brazzil Mag - Appeals Court in Brazil Overturns US$ 13 Bi Judgement Against Philip Morris
Advertisement
  Friday, 27 November 2009 
Main Menu
Home
News
Back Issues
Advertising
Contact Us
Brazil Forum
Magazine
Brazzil Classic
Yellow Pages
Classifieds
Images
BrazzilMag Newsfeed
Custom Search
Amazon Body Care
-------------
Brazil /Organic personal skin care wholesale / Brazil
--------------
Who's Online
We have 155 guests online
Latest News
Statistics
Members: 494
News: 11478
Web Links: 0
User Menu
Your Details
Submit News
Check-In My Items
My Comments
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Most Read
Related Items
Contribution
Have you got news?

Do you have news, comment or story on Brazil you want to share with Brazzil? Just send it our way to brazzil@brazzil.com.

 
The Latest from Brazzil Magazine
Home
Appeals Court in Brazil Overturns US$ 13 Bi Judgement Against Philip Morris PDF Print E-mail
Written by Newsroom   
Friday, 14 November 2008

A cigarette pack in Brazil In Brazil, the 7th Civil Chamber of the Court of Appeals of the State of São Paulo repealed, by unanimous vote, the judgment of the court of 1st instance that had found in favor of the indemnification claim brought by the Association for the Defense of the Health of Smokers (ADESF) against two Brazilian cigarette manufacturers.

The companies involved are Souza Cruz, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, and Philip Morris Brasil, a subsidiary of Philip Morris International. They were found guilty of misleading advertising and had been ordered to pay 30 billion reais (US$ 13.2 billion) in damages in 2004.

In the first judgment, the judge had determined that every Brazilian smoker should receive 1,000 reais (US$ 439) for every year he or she had smoked. The judge arrived at the US$ 13.2 billion by assuming an average of 10 years of smoking for each smoker.

The Court of Appeals granted the appeals of the manufacturers on grounds that the lower civil court decision had violated the constitutional principle of due process of law since it had failed to extend to the manufacturers the opportunity of producing any evidence, including expert evidence that had already been ordered by the Court of Appeals itself.

This case, which is the first lawsuit of this nature filed in Brazil, began with the filing of a class action at the 19th Civil Court of São Paulo in July of 1995.

The plaintiff is ADESF, an association initially created by three attorneys and a doctor, 14 days prior to the filing of said lawsuit, which seeks to represent all smokers in Brazil. The entity is also linked to several anti-tobacco organizations and maintains a broad network of attorneys throughout the country for the purpose of filing lawsuits against cigarette manufacturers.

The 2004 lower court early judgment, which the Court of Appeals set aside, had found in favor of ADESF's requests, which sought indemnification for "all the consumers of defendant's products" for moral and material damages attributed to tobacco, in addition to having the manufacturers include in the cigarette packages the warning already imposed by the Ministry of Health in 1999.

With the decision of the Court of Appeals, the case returns to the original trial court for production of evidence and new judgment.

All class actions of this type that have already been judged conclusively by Brazilian Courts ended without the intended liability of the manufacturers. The subject matter of these class actions is identical to that of hundreds of individual actions already dismissed throughout the country.

The São Paulo State Court of Appeals alone has already rendered more than 30 rulings rejecting this type of product liability claim.

The main reasoning of the Brazilian Courts for rejecting this type of claim is: consumers have free will to decide (or not) to smoke, since the decision to consume the product or not is a question of free choice, the widespread public knowledge of the diseases associated with cigarette consumption and the absence of defect in the product because it is a product of inherent risk, the manufacture, distribution and sale of which in Brazil is authorized and subject to severe regulations by the state.

Hits: 2542
Comments (1)Add Comment
next the deer and rum makers
written by forrest allen brown, November 15, 2008
why is it people want to get money from a company that hurts them but never a government that does .

if you look to the left on this page and see all the papers on smokeing and then you look on the streets
of brazil and look at all the kids brazil has done nothing to stop stors from selling them to minors .
very little to prmote on TV to stop smokeing .

and i just bet that if it were looked into the brazilian medical assocation holds a major stok in booth compaines along with all the
congress

there motto
hookem while there young

people need to be more self responsable
except blame for there own actions

just grow some ballls and live with your desicion
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=
 
< Prev   Next >
Brazzil Magazine on Twitter


Visit Brazzil Social with Video, Music and Chat


Home
Brazzil Magazine - Since 1989 trying to understand Brazil
  • Poor Women from Northeast Brazil Learn Joy of Meeting and Helping Each Other


    Joined hands The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area.

  • Ahmadinejad's Visit: Iran, Honduras and Brazil's Hypocrisy in Dealing With Them


    Ahmadinejad and Lula The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy.

  • Lula Is About to Fulfill His Wish of Getting His Good Friend Chavez in Mercosur


    Lula and Chavez On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil.

  • Denying Education is the Other AIDS. And Brazil Is Guilty of Inflicting It


    Children from a Diadema band Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms.

  • Child Labor Went Down in Brazil, But 5 Million Underage Workers Are Still Way Too Many


    Child labor in Brazil One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis.

  • Some Humility Would Do Lula Good. On Human Rights Brazil Has Long Way to Go


    A prison in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking.

  • Brazil's Amazon Rainforest Policy Is a One-Way Road to Disaster


    Trasamazonian road in BrazilDepletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse.

  • Geisy, Brazil's Miniskirt Student, Should Try US College Next Year


    Geisy Arruda from BrazilGeisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose.

  • Vigilante Groups in Brazil Trump Drug Gangs and Become Rio's New Authority


    Brazilian favela in Rio The push of vigilante groups in Rio de Janeiro's favelas (shantytowns) in the last three years is the most important and alarming information of the just-released study by the Rio de Janeiro University's Violence Research Center (Nupev-Uerj).

  • Brazil Police Use Press Coverage as Green Light to Kill and Invade Houses in Rio


    Rio police in a favela A dispute over drug trafficking territory in Rio de Janeiro has intensified lately, leaving in its wake unprecedented acts of violence, such as the downing of a police helicopter in the northern zone of the city on October 17.  Three policemen died and another two were injured.  This event has drawn the attention of the international media, who are raising the issue of public security for the 2016 Olympics to be held in Rio.