Brazil - Brazzil Mag - Brazil to Count More on Wind and Nuclear Energy to Get Electricity
Advertisement
  Home arrow News arrow February 2009 arrow Brazil to Count More on Wind and Nuclear Energy to Get Electricity Saturday, 28 November 2009 
Main Menu
Home
News
Back Issues
Advertising
Contact Us
Brazil Forum
Magazine
Brazzil Classic
Yellow Pages
Classifieds
Images
BrazzilMag Newsfeed
Custom Search
Amazon Body Care
-------------
Brazil /Organic personal skin care wholesale / Brazil
--------------
Who's Online
We have 168 guests online
Latest News
Statistics
Members: 494
News: 11482
Web Links: 0
User Menu
Your Details
Submit News
Check-In My Items
My Comments
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Most Read
Related Items
Contribution
Have you got news?

Do you have news, comment or story on Brazil you want to share with Brazzil? Just send it our way to brazzil@brazzil.com.

 
The Latest from Brazzil Magazine
Home
Brazil to Count More on Wind and Nuclear Energy to Get Electricity PDF Print E-mail
Written by Newsroom   
Wednesday, 11 February 2009

Wind energy in the south of Brazil According to Brazilian Energy Minister Edson Lobão, Brazil needs to increase its electricity generation capacity by 50% over the next 10 years. He described the task as an "enormous challenge" for the country.

"Adding 51,000 megawatts to the country's current power capacity, (or) an average of more than 5,000 megawatts per year, that would be an enormous challenge," said Lobão.

Nevertheless, he said that target may have to be revised depending on the impact of the global financial crisis in Brazil, since the country's electricity needs have been calculated on the basis of estimated economic growth of 4.9% annually, a forecast made prior to the financial meltdown.

The Brazilian Central Bank estimates that because of the crisis, the country will grow at a rate of around 3%, although the International Monetary Fund and other organizations are forecasting growth of between 1.8 and 2% in 2009 and 3.5% in 2010.

Lobão said that in addition to boosting output the country must shift to different methods of generating electricity; he said the goal is a reduction of at least 10 percentage points in the amount produced by hydroelectric plants, which today accounts for 85% of the country's electricity consumption.

He said the plans call for more wind energy plants and the construction of four new nuclear plants, in addition to the two currently in operation at Angra dos Reis, a coastal city 150 kilometers from Rio de Janeiro.

Construction of the four nuclear power plants is to be put out to tender in the middle of this year, according to Lobão, who said those plans could change depending on Brazil's economic performance.

Lobão added that the government hopes to encourage consumers to replace 10 million old, inefficient refrigerators with others that are more modern and energy-efficient and less contaminating.

Mercopress

Hits: 4173
Comments (27)Add Comment
Narrow vision
written by Craig Berg, February 11, 2009
Wind energy, OK. Nuclear, no way. Read the facts about proliferation risks, risk of accident, environmental degredation , and the problem of nuclear waste:
http://www.wagingpeace.org/menu/issues/nuclear-energy-&-waste/start/fact-sheet_ne&w.htm
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
narrow vision craig berg
written by sage, February 11, 2009
maybe true for outdated us nuclear technology, but not for state of the art french nuclear tech, which recycles waste back into the fuel cycle.
what exactly does craig mean by proliferation risk???
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Nuclear energy
written by falupa, February 11, 2009
The problem with nuclear energy are the costs associated with it. It can also be extremely deadly and dangerous if not tended to properly. Nuclear energy on the other side is also a great thing to have. This is because it is very cheap once you have the resources started.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Your comments are anwered in the link I posted
written by Craig Berg, February 11, 2009
Proliferation risk and the so-called "state of the art french nuclear tech which recycles waste back" are addressed in the link I posted. Please go here to educate yourself on these critical issues: http://www.wagingpeace.org/men..._ne&w.htm.
Proliferation Risks :
Plutonium is a man-made waste product of nuclear fission, which can be used either for fuel in nuclear power plants or for bombs.
In the year 2000, an estimated 310 tons (620,000 pounds) of civilian, weapons-usable plutonium had been produced.
Less than 8 kilograms (about 18 pounds) of plutonium is enough for one Nagasaki-type bomb. Thus, in the year 2000 alone, enough plutonium was created to make more than 34,000 nuclear weapons.
The technology for producing nuclear energy that is shared among nations, particularly the process that turns raw uranium into lowly-enriched uranium, can also be used to produce highly-enriched, weapons-grade uranium.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is responsible for monitoring the world’s nuclear facilities and for preventing weapons proliferation, but their safeguards have serious shortcomings. Though the IAEA is promoting additional safeguards agreements to increase the effectiveness of their inspections, the agency acknowledges that, due to measurement uncertainties, it cannot detect all possible diversions of nuclear material. (Nuclear Control Institute)


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Double-Dot, February 11, 2009
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is responsible for monitoring the world’s nuclear facilities and for preventing weapons proliferation, but their safeguards have serious shortcomings. Though the IAEA is promoting additional safeguards agreements to increase the effectiveness of their inspections, the agency acknowledges that, due to measurement uncertainties, it cannot detect all possible diversions of nuclear material. (Nuclear Control Institute)


IAEA is toothless. Remember Collin Powell giving a big speech in U.N about the WMDs in Iraq? Remember about Saddam importing yellow cakes from Niger? In general, all these "International Agencies" are in the pockets of the "permanent" members of the U.N. security council. This fact is incontestable. Any leader who contests ends up in the gallows. Didn't you know it ?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
waging peace - craig berg
written by sage, February 12, 2009
for the record, there is only 1 country in the world that has used nuclear weapons & continues
threatening to use them pre-emptively - guess which 1...the iaea is not allowed to inspect it's facilities
the other countries that are also in possession of such weapons dont encourage/allow iaea inspections.
this handful of 8 countries are probably the largest proliferators........

your proliferation concerns are hipocritical at best & devious at worst........

in any case brazil needs to balance it's power grid profile w/ a modern, safe (franco-german) nuclear vector.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
"Modern, safe nuclear reactor"? Don't believe it! Please read the facts.
written by Craig Berg, February 12, 2009
Yes, IAEA is toothless to protect against the dangers of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy in any country is folly. The dangers are too great and Brazil should adopt a saner approach to its energy needs. It has the creativity to find "um jeitinho" instead of the poisonous path of nuclear energy. Please read:
Risk of Accident
On April 26, 1986 the No. 4 reactor at the Chernobyl power plant (in the former U.S.S.R., present-day Ukraine) exploded, causing the worst nuclear accident ever.
30 people were killed instantly, including 28 from radiation exposure, and a further 209 on site were treated for acute radiation poisoning.
The World Health Organization found that the fallout from the explosion was incredibly far-reaching. For a time, radiation levels in Scotland, over 1400 miles (about 2300 km) away, were 10,000 times the norm.
Thousands of cancer deaths were a direct result of the accident.
The accident cost the former Soviet Union more than three times the economical benefits accrued from the operation of every other Soviet nuclear power plant operated between 1954 and 1990.
In March of 1979 equipment failures and human error contributed to an accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, the worst such accident in U.S. history. Consequences of the incident include radiation contamination of surrounding areas, increased cases of thyroid cancer, and plant mutations.
According to the US House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations, "Calculation of Reactor Accident Consequences (CRAC2) for US Nuclear Power Plants” (1982, 1997), an accident at a US nuclear power plant could kill more people than were killed by the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki.

Environmental Degradation
All the steps in the complex process of creating nuclear energy entail environmental hazards.
The mining of uranium, as well as its refining and enrichment, and the production of plutonium produce radioactive isotopes that contaminate the surrounding area, including the groundwater, air, land, plants, and equipment. As a result, humans and the entire ecosystem are adversely and profoundly affected.
Some of these radioactive isotopes are extraordinarily long-lived, remaining toxic for hundreds of thousands of years. Presently, we are only beginning to observe and experience the consequences of producing nuclear energy

Nuclear Waste
Nuclear waste is produced in many different ways. There are wastes produced in the reactor core, wastes created as a result of radioactive contamination, and wastes produced as a byproduct of uranium mining, refining, and enrichment. The vast majority of radiation in nuclear waste is given off from spent fuel rods.
A typical reactor will generate 20 to 30 tons of high-level nuclear waste annually. There is no known way to safely dispose of this waste, which remains dangerously radioactive until it naturally decays.
The rate of decay of a radioactive isotope is called its half-life, the time in which half the initial amount of atoms present takes to decay. The half-life of Plutonium-239, one particularly lethal component of nuclear waste, is 24,000 years.
The hazardous life of a radioactive element (the length of time that must elapse before the material is considered safe) is at least 10 half-lives. Therefore, Plutonium-239 will remain hazardous for at least 240,000 years.
There is a current proposal to dump nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.
The plan is for Yucca Mountain to hold all of the high level nuclear waste ever produced from every nuclear power plant in the US. However, that would completely fill up the site and not account for future waste.
Transporting the wastes by truck and rail would be extremely dangerous.
For a more detailed analysis of the problems of and risks incurred by the plan, see Top Ten Reasons to Oppose the DoE’s Yucca Mountain Plan
Repository sites in Australia, Argentina, China, southern Africa, and Russia have also been considered.
Though some countries reprocess nuclear waste (in essence, preparing it to send through the cycle again to create more energy), this process is banned in the U.S. due to increased proliferation risks, as the reprocessed materials can also be used for making bombs. Reprocessing is also not a solution because it just creates additional nuclear waste.
The best action would be to cease producing nuclear energy (and waste), to leave the existing waste where it is, and to immobilize it. There are a few different methods of waste immobilization. In the vitrification process, waste is combined with glass-forming materials and melted. Once the materials solidify, the waste is trapped inside and can't easily be released.
Brazil can be successful on a more natural path.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Natural energy alterernatives to nuclear nonsense
written by Craig Berg, February 12, 2009
There are many alternative energy sources that are sustainable and do not pose the accident risks inherent in nuclear energy production. These sources include:

Bioenergy: biomass, such as plant matter and animal waste, can yield power, heat, steam, and fuel.
Geothermal: renewable heat energy can be harnessed from deep within the earth.
Wind: turbines turning in the air convert kinetic energy in the wind into electricity. (Put that minuano to good use!)
Solar: the sun’s energy can be captured and used to produce heat and electricity. (the beach beauties in Leblon are already doing it).
Hydrogen: if produced by renewable sources, it can power fuel cells to convert chemical energy directly into electricity, with useful heat and water as the only byproducts.
Tidal: using the movement of the ocean to power turbines and generate electricity.
Many more sustainable resources could be found and current resources improved if better technology were available and if the government and utilities actively promoted their development.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Wind energy my ass
written by triple dot, February 13, 2009
Wind energy is only good when there is wind... unless Double-Dot here stands in front of the windmills blowing.. it all depends on the weather so it's not a constant/reliable source of energy...

If you want energy, stop complaining Double-Dot.... if you're unsatisfied, go and live in the trees alongside your own kind monkeys...


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
natural energy - craig berg
written by sage, February 13, 2009
u make some good points. however, all the safety & recycling issues you refer to are based on
unstable & obsolete us & russian designs. france generates 80% of it's total energy from nuclear
power & has not had any of these issues. their designs are as safe as gas fired thermal electric
plants. you are missing the point. from a risk & technology empowerment standpoint, it is imperative
that brazil have some nuclear component to it's energy matrix.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Double-Dot, February 14, 2009
If you want energy, stop complaining Double-Dot.... if you're unsatisfied, go and live in the trees alongside your own kind monkeys...


I will leave that option to ignorant peasants like you. You must be an ambulance chaser without any notion of sources of any energy. Just sit in your cave and keep on scratching the walls and let the big boys discuss this important issue more seriously. Craig and Sage are exchanging some interesting details and I am listening.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
About Double Dot
written by dnbaiacu, February 14, 2009
Remember about Saddam importing yellow cakes from Niger?


I agree with tripe dot... you are just writing shit here.. go to your neverland island and eat your yellow cakes there since you clearly refuse to grow up and talk sense here...

Craig and Sage are exchanging some interesting details and I am listening.


If you are listening, how come you haven't learned anything yet? Everybody here has something constructive to say...You are just talking shit after shit... no numbers, no facts, just pure childish shit..

Triple dot is right.. you should go back to the trees with your monkeys and stop annoying people here..

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Thanks
written by tripe dot, February 14, 2009
Thanks dnbaiacu smilies/grin.gif

I don't know why this guy is here... he has been bothering me for a long time.. I believe he must be getting some sort of sexual satisfaction out of it


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
...
written by Double-Dot, February 14, 2009
Everybody here has something constructive to say...


Except you.

You are just talking shit after shit... no numbers, no facts,


What numbers and facts have you given so far ?

I believe he must be getting some sort of sexual satisfaction out of it


Don´t judge everybody by your standards. Goodbye and keep on talking to your mirror image which is the only audience you have.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Double-Dot
written by tripe dot, February 14, 2009
Don´t judge everybody by your standards. Goodbye and keep on talking to your mirror image which is the only audience you have.


Im not asking for audience I just give opinions and I never judge anyone,that's not up to me...

You, however, seem to be trying to get some attention with your insults towards me and other people here.. you have no life... nothing else to do rather than coming here to disrespect people who are expressing their opinions in subjects beyond your mental capability ..

As my friend here said stop annoying people with insults and go to your neverland island to eat your yellow cakes...


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
...
written by Double-Dot, February 14, 2009
I just give opinions


Every single blogger in this site is waiting for your relevant opinions and you are too slow to express them.

As my friend here said stop annoying people with insults


You have friends? That is a breaking news. smilies/wink.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Double dot
written by triple dot, February 14, 2009
Every single blogger in this site is waiting for your relevant opinions and you are too slow to express them.


Speak for yourself and don't include other people in your silly games idiot
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Oh god
written by dnbaiacu, February 14, 2009
Double dot, you still on and on insulting people here... Don't you have anything better to do ????

What you're doing is very childish and ridiculous.... stop writing your stupid remarks towards people here... you are the one who has been causing trouble here for a long time... i think it's time for you to give it a rest...

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Fools
written by Linderman, February 14, 2009
You fools, can't see this guy here Double dot just want to argue ? The more you tell him to stop, the more he will carry on annoying you, you fools...

Unfortunately, this site's administrator allows people like him to bother bloggers here... if we all ignore his crap, he will get tired and get a life eventually...




report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
...
written by Double-Dot, February 15, 2009
Fools


Apt description. Excellent comment by Lindermann. smilies/cool.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Double dot
written by tripe dot, February 15, 2009
Unfortunately, this site's administrator allows people like him to bother bloggers here... if we all ignore his crap, he will get tired and get a life eventually...


Yes, I agree with you Double dot.. Excellent comment/advice by Linderman to ignore you because you crap with your mouth, idiot smilies/grin.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Sage Advice
written by Craig Berg, February 15, 2009
Sage, your infatuation with the French nuclear technology is unwarranted. It is not true that France's nuclear energy record is unblemished:
In July 2008, 18,000 litres (4,755 Gallons) of Uranium solution containing natural uranium were accidentally released from Tricastin Nuclear Power Center. Testing found elevated uranium levels in the nearby Gaffière and Lauzon rivers. The liquid that escaped to the ground contained about 75kg of unenriched uranium which is toxic as a heavy metal while possessing only slight radioactivity. French authorities have banned the use of water from the Gaffière and Lauzon for drinking and watering of crops. Swimming, water sports and fishing were also banned. This incident has been classified as Level 1 on the International Nuclear Event Scale. Again in July 2008, approximately 100 employees of were exposed to radioactive particles that escaped from a pipe in a reactor that had been shut down. Just level 1 incidents, but proof that the French technology is not fool-proof.

Do you think the proponents of nuclear energy plants in the US and Russia thought the safeguards used in those plants (which resulted in Chernobyl, Three Mile Island disasters) were any less safe than what you believe France's current technology to be? The chair of the investigation into the Three Mile Island disaster, John Kemeny, said: "The palnts are safe; it's the people who aren't."The bottom line: Can anyone guarantee the safety of these enormously poisonous nuclear wastes for 10,000 years? Think about it.

We both want Brazil to be able to meet its energy needs as the nation enjoys abundant economic growth. But not all that glitters is gold. I am not a Luddite. Brazil must be sagacious and do the right thing at this critical juncture. Brazil is perhaps the nation most blessed by Mother Nature. Woo her properly and she will give ("Plantando da'"!). But splitting the atom is a rude poke in her ribs.



report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Oh God
written by dnbaiacu, February 15, 2009
Excellent comment by Lindermann.


Did Double dot just say Excellent comment by Linderman??? My friend triple dot, can this moron read at all ?

Linderman here said anyone is a fool for wasting time with Double dot because he is just annoying people here randomly... he also added that he should get a life... and Double dot still says excellent comment.. Oh my God, this boy is mental smilies/cool.gif

.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
...
written by Double-Dot, February 15, 2009
Linderman here said anyone is a fool for wasting time with Double dot because he is just annoying people here randomly


That´s because Lindermann is far brighter than you guys. He gave a sound advice to you two FOOLS. Take it or leave it.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Double dot
written by tripe dot, February 15, 2009
That´s because Lindermann is far brighter than you guys. He gave a sound advice to you two FOOLS. Take it or leave it.


Oh yes, I take his advice... especially the part that he calls you a no-life shit person smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Still arguing ...
written by Linderman, February 16, 2009
Gosh, you still arguing.... why don't you exchange emails so you keep on arguing somewhere else?

This creature that calls himself Double dot just want to argue and disrupt bloggers who want to post their comments here... so please, don't get me involved with your stupid argument...




report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Nuclear Energy in Brazil - Expensive,dangerous and unnecessary.
written by du48, February 17, 2009
For those who can read Portuguese, may I suggest the following link to an article by Jose Eli
da Veiga FEA-USP.

http://www.e-agora.org.br/arqu...rcha-a-re/
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=
 
< Prev   Next >
Brazzil Magazine on Twitter


Visit Brazzil Social with Video, Music and Chat


Home
Brazzil Magazine - Since 1989 trying to understand Brazil
  • Poor Women from Northeast Brazil Learn Joy of Meeting and Helping Each Other


    Joined hands The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area.

  • Ahmadinejad's Visit: Iran, Honduras and Brazil's Hypocrisy in Dealing With Them


    Ahmadinejad and Lula The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy.

  • Lula Is About to Fulfill His Wish of Getting His Good Friend Chavez in Mercosur


    Lula and Chavez On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil.

  • Denying Education is the Other AIDS. And Brazil Is Guilty of Inflicting It


    Children from a Diadema band Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms.

  • Child Labor Went Down in Brazil, But 5 Million Underage Workers Are Still Way Too Many


    Child labor in Brazil One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis.

  • Some Humility Would Do Lula Good. On Human Rights Brazil Has Long Way to Go


    A prison in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking.

  • Brazil's Amazon Rainforest Policy Is a One-Way Road to Disaster


    Trasamazonian road in BrazilDepletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse.

  • Geisy, Brazil's Miniskirt Student, Should Try US College Next Year


    Geisy Arruda from BrazilGeisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose.

  • Vigilante Groups in Brazil Trump Drug Gangs and Become Rio's New Authority


    Brazilian favela in Rio The push of vigilante groups in Rio de Janeiro's favelas (shantytowns) in the last three years is the most important and alarming information of the just-released study by the Rio de Janeiro University's Violence Research Center (Nupev-Uerj).

  • Brazil Police Use Press Coverage as Green Light to Kill and Invade Houses in Rio


    Rio police in a favela A dispute over drug trafficking territory in Rio de Janeiro has intensified lately, leaving in its wake unprecedented acts of violence, such as the downing of a police helicopter in the northern zone of the city on October 17.  Three policemen died and another two were injured.  This event has drawn the attention of the international media, who are raising the issue of public security for the 2016 Olympics to be held in Rio.