|
Brazil's Forum in Defense of Indigenous Rights (FDDI) issued, yesterday, its "April Manifesto," criticizing Lula's Administration in terms of Indian policies.
The text refers to "slowness" in the process of demarcation of indigenous territories and associates this situation with the violation of indigenous rights.
The document also presents a list of demands aimed at solving these problems. The suggestions include the creation of the National Indian Policy Council.
In addition, the manifesto urges the Minister of Justice, Márcio Thomaz Bastos, to proclaim immediately Indian ownership of 10 areas located in the states of Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Pará, Amazonas, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Mato Grosso.
In the manifesto, the government is characterized as "anti-Indian." "In the absence of a new Indian policy, interests opposed to the indigenous peoples occupied the vacuum.
"Indian policy was remilitarized. The Institutional Security Cabinet assumed unprecedented importance in Indian affairs. Old and outdated concepts of national security and sovereignty, no matter how mistaken, were applied once again, with intensity.
"Now not only by segments of the military but also by the most reactionary rural oligarchies, who used them to defend their most immediate interests," the document says.
In the view of the FDDI, the pace of the proceedings to legalize indigenous territories was slowed under the current Administration and subordinated to an ethnocentric and genocidal neoliberal development project, the governability of which is being negotiated with sectors of the Brazilian rural oligarchy, the same class that blocked peace and democracy in the countryside."
The text points out that the number of territories declared to be Indian property during Lula's Administration is the lowest since the end of the military regime.
"Lula's Administration has legalized an average of 6 Indian territories per year. Fernando Henrique Cardoso's Administration, which was also indifferent to the cause, legalized an average of 14 territories each year during its mandate, more than double what Lula's Administration has done. Indigenous territories have become political chips in the political bargaining with governors of some states."
The criticisms also extend to the health assistance given to the indigenous population.
"Indigenous health is a scandal. The Funasa (National Health Foundation) spends millions on seminars and meetings while Indian children die of malnutrition, as shown by what is happening in Mato Grosso do Sul. The emergency measures that were just adopted are whitewash. The problem demands the coordination - currently non-existent - of governmental activities and special governmental policies for the Indian peoples."
Another demand made by the indigenous organizations is for lawmakers to reject the Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC), together with other projects before the Congress which are contrary to Indian interests.
According to the general coordinator of the Coordination of Indigenous Organizations of the Brazilian Amazon (Coiab), Jecinaldo Barbosa, if the PEC is approved, the demarcations of Indian territories will have to go through the Legislature, instead of being examined strictly within the Executive sphere.
"This would be a big step backwards, since nowadays we observe an anti-Indian conjuncture in the National Congress," Barbosa remarked at the launching of the manifesto.
Translation: David Silberstein
Agência Brasil
 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area. 
The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy. 
On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil. 
Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms. 
One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis. 
On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking. 
Depletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse. 
Geisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose. 
The push of vigilante groups in Rio de Janeiro's favelas (shantytowns) in the last three years is the most important and alarming information of the just-released study by the Rio de Janeiro University's Violence Research Center (Nupev-Uerj). 
A dispute over drug trafficking territory in Rio de Janeiro has intensified lately, leaving in its wake unprecedented acts of violence, such as the downing of a police helicopter in the northern zone of the city on October 17. Three policemen died and another two were injured. This event has drawn the attention of the international media, who are raising the issue of public security for the 2016 Olympics to be held in Rio.