|
The doctrine of "collective public goods," such as drinking water and forest resources, and their management by the "international community," rather than by the governments of the countries where they are situated, is becoming increasingly popular in international debating circles and may represent the germ of future foreign interference in the Amazon, according to the executive secretary of Brazil's Ministry of Foreign Relations (Itamaraty), Samuel Pinheiro Guimarães.
"Nowadays, a physical presence is not required in order to enjoy the benefits of occupation," Guimarães declared, referring to the Amazon region, in a debate, "The Internationalization of the Amazon: Real Risk or Imaginary Fear," sponsored by the Brazilian Senate.
"I wouldn't claim that there is a threat that the Amazon will be internationalized, but I confess I find it interesting that this concern never goes away."
The diplomat explained that these ideas are still largely confined to seminar debates, although they may be spreading to "ever-widening circles."
And he added that Brazil's chief concern should be to administer the region adequately. "To the extent that the sovereign State administers the natural resources of the Amazon region, all types of threats diminish to the same degree."
At the beginning of this year, the Itamaraty issued a note in response to declarations by the former Trade Commissioner of the European Union, Pascal Lamy.
According to Guimarães, at an Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) debate in Geneva on "global governance," Lamy, who is currently a candidate for the post of director-general of the World Trade Organization (WTO), spoke in favor of "international rules for collective public goods," such as tropical forests (without referring specifically to the Amazon), water, fish, and the ozone layer.
The appropriateness of emitting this note was questioned by the Senators. Guimarães replied that the Itamaraty's statement was "firm," not "exaggerated," and that it was intended to reaffirm that "Brazil is competent to administer its territory."
Agência Brasil
 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Brazil received a huge boost in its international image with its selection as the host of the 2016 Olympics, but it was really just the cherry on top of the overall recognition of the country's ascension to the ranks of one of the world's most important countries. Now, as it finally takes its place on the world scene, there has been a great deal of concern about what kind of image Brazil hopes to project, now that the world is really paying attention. 
The only good thing to say about the visit to Brazil of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, on Monday November 23, is that it was mercifully short and lasted less than 24 hours. Ahmadinejad had his picture taken being hugged by president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva who gave him a warm welcome and said Iran had every right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. 
The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area. 
The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy. 
On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil. 
Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms. 
One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis. 
On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking. 
Depletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse. 
Geisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose.
Do we find it amazing that it is these two organizations that have stood in the way of 'loan forgiveness' for the least developed nations. Why? Simply because under any loan forgiveness program, these two organizations lose their leverage to influence the economies and societies under their thumbs. Is it any wonder that the highest economic priority of most of the developing world is to get as far away from these bloodsuckers as possible. They have no credibility except among their patrons. The misery they bring along with their meager loans is far more damaging than bankruptcy.
It is a 'special day' when a nation releases itself from this 'servitude of debt', just as much as a nation freeing itself from slavery. All nations are justified to celebrate these as special moments. They are just too polite to say why!
Now the WTO attempts 'social engineering' through trade relations. Well, for those who cannot figure it out, not only trade will be on the WTO agenda. Trade will simply be used as the leverage to accept WTO mandates on other issues that are internal and sovereign rights. Better the WTO work for better trade 'fairness', and perhaps consistent worker rights throughout the WTO members, than trying to 'socialize' the natural resources of members through trade policy.
Any nation that bases its trade policy primarily through WTO policy will find itself shackled to the same 'social engineering' practices that they hated in the IMF and World Bank. Regional trade alliances are critically important as a counterweight to dependence on the policies of the New World Order. The higher the percent of trade done exclusively through WTO policies, the higher the degree of influence WTO will have to leverage the national and international policies of its members.
The present dance of the 'super-members', or the G-8 nations, is totally Axis and Alliance driven. That is the primary reason for the present and long-running obstacles to agreement between Brazil, and others, against the WTO. US and EU may agree bilaterally to certain subsidies and fall under WTO guidelines, while holding developing nations to different standards. Now the WTO becomes the mechanism for market domination instead of market regulation, so the US wants FTAA and WTO for enforcement.