|
The Parliamentary Front for a Brazil without Firearms officially launches its campaign, today, in Campinas, in the interior of São Paulo state, in favor of prohibiting firearms sales in the country.
The secretary-general of the Front, Federal Deputy Raul Jungmann, said that the first major event organized by the Deputies and Senators will be a show and rally, gathering actors, intellectuals, and politicians who support the disarmament proposal, on August 11 in Rio de Janeiro.
They are all in favor of a "yes" vote in the October 23 referendum, when voters will be asked to respond to the question: "Should firearm and ammunition sales be prohibited in Brazil?"
The members of the Parliamentary Front want to explain to the Brazilian people that firearms sales constitute one of the elements that contribute directly to the growth of violence in the country.
"We shall extend the debate beyond the question of arms sales. In order to understand why firearm and ammunition sales should be prohibited, the discussion must include the questions of the police forces, the judicial system, and the prison system," Jungmann pointed out.
The Deputy recalled that Brazil holds the world record in homicides resulting from firearm use and has 18 million firearms scattered throughout the country. Half of these weapons are illegal or irregular.
"To emerge from this situation in which we are entrapped, we must take a stand the way we did in the past in the Direct Elections Now movement. This can only be done through a campaign of civic education, and the referendum offers precisely this chance," Jungmann affirmed.
The secretary of the Parliamentary Front announced that committees will be set up all over the country to defend the end of firearm sales.
The "Brazil without Firearms" group also plans to produce educational booklets and establish a toll-free 0800 number to clarify doubts people may have about the referendum and the campaign.
Jungmann confessed, however, that the resources available for the pro-disarmament campaign will be limited.
"We shall be engaged in a bare bones campaign. We plan to hold shows to raise funds at rallies and appeal to the public for donations. Even with little money, we will be able to use the radio and television to present our proposals," he said.
The Deputy was unable to estimate the amount necessary to cover the costs of the campaign.
The TSE (Federal Elections Board) figures it will spend US$ 88 million (210 million reais) on the referendum, including expenses for voter reregistration in various Brazilian states.
"Just on gunshot wound victims, the National Health System spends R$ 180 million per year, which is practically all we shall spend on the referendum," Jungmann affirmed.
The Parliamentary Front for a Brazil without Firearms is presided by Senator Renan Calheiros (PMDB-Alagoas) and composed of the following lawmakers: Luiz Otávio (PMDB-Pará), Gerson Camata (PMDB-Espírito Santo), César Borges (PFL-Bahia), Demóstenes Torres (PFL-Goiás), Tasso Jereissati (PSDB-Ceará), Arthur Virgílio (PSDB-Amazonas), Aloizio Mercadante (PT-São Paulo), Valmir Amaral (PP-Distrito Federal), Patrícia Saboya (unaffiliated-Ceará), Marcelo Crivella (PL-Rio de Janeiro), Raul Jungmann (PPS-Pernambuco), Luiz Eduardo Greenhalgh (PT-São Paulo), João Paulo Cunha (PT-São Paulo), Maria Lúcia Cardoso (PMDB-Minas Gerais), Alberto Goldman (PSDB-São Paulo), Jorge Gomes (PSB-Pernambuco), ACM Neto (PFL-Bahia), Fernando Gabeira (PV-Rio de Janeiro), João Fontes (PDT-Sergipe), Luiz Antônio de Medeiros (PL-São Paulo), and Renildo Calheiros (PCdoB-Pernambuco).
Agência Brasil
 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area. 
The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy. 
On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil. 
Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms. 
One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis. 
On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking. 
Depletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse. 
Geisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose. 
The push of vigilante groups in Rio de Janeiro's favelas (shantytowns) in the last three years is the most important and alarming information of the just-released study by the Rio de Janeiro University's Violence Research Center (Nupev-Uerj). 
A dispute over drug trafficking territory in Rio de Janeiro has intensified lately, leaving in its wake unprecedented acts of violence, such as the downing of a police helicopter in the northern zone of the city on October 17. Three policemen died and another two were injured. This event has drawn the attention of the international media, who are raising the issue of public security for the 2016 Olympics to be held in Rio.
It seems clear that many individuals within the political and intellectual elite of Brazil have done very little research on gun control and its effects. As usual, it is precisely such people who appear to have the strongest and most extreme opinions and "solutions".
Had they taken the trouble to study well-constructed criminological studies written by competent academics, they would have found- probably to their surprise- that the relationship between the availability of legal guns and crime is actually inverse. In other words, violent crime does not fall but actually increases as the number of legal guns is reduced.
My recent review of gun control and homicides ("How Governments cause crime")confirms this and allows the prediction that -contrary to the naive and optimistic thinking of those supporting the gun-free referendum- the outcome for ordinary Brazilians will be a rapid and very significant worsening in murders and other violent crimes.
If the experience of other countries with gun prohibition is any guide, Brazil can expect at least a DOUBLING of its murder rate in much less than a decade.
Given this well-documented if poorly known fact it is surely important to future-proof the Brazilian referedum and ask each of its high profile proponents whether they accept personal liability in law to the families of victims should murders rates increase significantly as predicted
A clear statement as to what compensation they would be prepared to pay should their brave new world turn out to be far worse than our present one should be a pre-requisite of holding the referendum.
It is surely high time the political and social elites of Brazil were shown that the long-suffering Brazilian taxpayer is no longer prepared to pay the social and financial costs of such naive and disproven social engineering
Yours sincerely
Dr Lech Beltowski
Auckland
New Zealand
PS;
Dear editor;
Please e-mail me at
lechb@adhb.govt.nz
for a copy of
"How Governments cause crime".