Brazil - Brazzil Mag - For Brazil WTO Negotiations Will Go Nowhere Without Political Spur
Advertisement
  Home arrow News arrow January 2006 arrow For Brazil WTO Negotiations Will Go Nowhere Without Political Spur Tuesday, 02 December 2008 
Main Menu
Home
News
Back Issues
Advertising
Contact Us
Brazil Forum
Magazine
Brazzil Classic
Yellow Pages
Classifieds
Images
BrazzilMag Newsfeed
Custom Search
Amazon Body Care


Credit Cards UK | Loans | Credit Cards | Debt Help | Mortgage Calculator
-------------
Brazil /Organic personal skin care wholesale / Brazil
--------------
Who's Online
We have 58 guests online
Latest News
Statistics
Members: 416
News: 10282
Web Links: 0
User Menu
Your Details
Submit News
Check-In My Items
My Comments
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Related Items
Contribution
Have you got news?

Do you have news, comment or story on Brazil you want to share with Brazzil? Just send it our way to brazzil@brazzil.com.

 

For Brazil WTO Negotiations Will Go Nowhere Without Political Spur PDF Print E-mail
Written by Mylena Fiori   
Thursday, 05 January 2006

The Brazilian Minister of Foreign Relations, Celso Amorim, said, Wednesday, January 4, that a political spur is needed to advance negotiations in the sphere of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

One possibility would be a January meeting of heads of State - a suggestion already proposed by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to various leaders, including US President George W. Bush, and British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

"If this political spur could come about without the need for a meeting, all the better. But, if a meeting is required, we should not hesitate. We can't allow the built-in limitations of ministers and negotiators to keep us from moving ahead on something that is so crucial to the whole world, especially the poor countries," Amorim affirmed after a work meeting with the Australian minister of Foreign Affairs, Alexander Downer.

According to Amorim, his "impression" is that the negotiators and commissioners have no more maneuvering space. "The decisions that must be made are really difficult, especially for those who are more reluctant when it comes to access to markets."

Amorim remarked that the European Union's justifications for not opening its markets to agricultural products are gradually losing their legitimacy. He cited as an example the argument that opening European markets would affect poor African countries currently benefited by preferences in these markets.

"After Hong Kong, these arguments have lost their force, since these poor countries themselves, from Africa, Asia, and other places, also demanded greater progress in agriculture," he pointed out. "I believe that it is now really a matter of having some kind of political spur."

Amorim said that it would be premature to speak at this moment about a date and place for a meeting of leaders. But he emphasized: "It must be soon; otherwise, it will have no influence on the machinery of the negotiations."

The current negotiating round was launched in 2001 in Doha, Qatar, for the purpose of establishing trade rules favorable to development. Agriculture, which was excluded from previous negotiations, is at the core of this round.

The agenda includes market access and an end to domestic and export subsidies. So far, however, the only advance was the establishment of 2013 as the deadline for the total elimination of export subsidies, in accordance with an agreement reached at the 6th WTO Ministerial Meeting, held last year in Hong Kong from December 13-18.

Agência Brasil

Hits: 5048
Comments (1)Add Comment
but the EU will probably.....
written by Guest, January 05, 2006



...not negotiate more if the developing countries dont open up more their industrial and services sectors.

As you said clearly, no deal is better than a bad deal.

The EU is in complete agreement with what you said ! No deal will be done in agriculture if no deal is done on industrial and services industries.

You never want to put something on the negotiation table but expect to get everything you request.

the asnwer is NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !
Because this is not negotiations where BOTH are pleased. Therefore it is no longer a negotiation but a predatory pressure from your side that is not acceptable.

You already have an annual trade surplus well above US$ 12 billions with the EU.

So simple.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=
 
< Prev   Next >