|
The Brazilian Minister of Foreign Relations, Celso Amorim, said, Wednesday, January 4, that a political spur is needed to advance negotiations in the sphere of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
One possibility would be a January meeting of heads of State - a suggestion already proposed by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to various leaders, including US President George W. Bush, and British Prime Minister Tony Blair. "If this political spur could come about without the need for a meeting, all the better. But, if a meeting is required, we should not hesitate. We can't allow the built-in limitations of ministers and negotiators to keep us from moving ahead on something that is so crucial to the whole world, especially the poor countries," Amorim affirmed after a work meeting with the Australian minister of Foreign Affairs, Alexander Downer. According to Amorim, his "impression" is that the negotiators and commissioners have no more maneuvering space. "The decisions that must be made are really difficult, especially for those who are more reluctant when it comes to access to markets." Amorim remarked that the European Union's justifications for not opening its markets to agricultural products are gradually losing their legitimacy. He cited as an example the argument that opening European markets would affect poor African countries currently benefited by preferences in these markets. "After Hong Kong, these arguments have lost their force, since these poor countries themselves, from Africa, Asia, and other places, also demanded greater progress in agriculture," he pointed out. "I believe that it is now really a matter of having some kind of political spur." Amorim said that it would be premature to speak at this moment about a date and place for a meeting of leaders. But he emphasized: "It must be soon; otherwise, it will have no influence on the machinery of the negotiations." The current negotiating round was launched in 2001 in Doha, Qatar, for the purpose of establishing trade rules favorable to development. Agriculture, which was excluded from previous negotiations, is at the core of this round. The agenda includes market access and an end to domestic and export subsidies. So far, however, the only advance was the establishment of 2013 as the deadline for the total elimination of export subsidies, in accordance with an agreement reached at the 6th WTO Ministerial Meeting, held last year in Hong Kong from December 13-18. Agência Brasil
 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area. 
The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy. 
On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil. 
Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms. 
One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis. 
On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking. 
Depletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse. 
Geisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose. 
The push of vigilante groups in Rio de Janeiro's favelas (shantytowns) in the last three years is the most important and alarming information of the just-released study by the Rio de Janeiro University's Violence Research Center (Nupev-Uerj). 
A dispute over drug trafficking territory in Rio de Janeiro has intensified lately, leaving in its wake unprecedented acts of violence, such as the downing of a police helicopter in the northern zone of the city on October 17. Three policemen died and another two were injured. This event has drawn the attention of the international media, who are raising the issue of public security for the 2016 Olympics to be held in Rio.
...not negotiate more if the developing countries dont open up more their industrial and services sectors.
As you said clearly, no deal is better than a bad deal.
The EU is in complete agreement with what you said ! No deal will be done in agriculture if no deal is done on industrial and services industries.
You never want to put something on the negotiation table but expect to get everything you request.
the asnwer is NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !
Because this is not negotiations where BOTH are pleased. Therefore it is no longer a negotiation but a predatory pressure from your side that is not acceptable.
You already have an annual trade surplus well above US$ 12 billions with the EU.
So simple.