|
The Pharaonic trans-Amazon natural gas conduit whose concept was approved amid much fanfare by the leaders of Venezuela, Brazil and Argentina this month makes little economic or technical sense, could cause great ecological damage and may end up being a figment of overly ambitious political imaginations, analysts told news agency EFE.
The three governments must make a decision in the next few months on the viability of the plan, which calls for a pipeline some 8,000 kilometers (nearly 5,000 miles) long with a capacity to carry 100 million cubic meters (3.5 billion cubic feet) of natural gas per day, mostly from north to south. Venezuela's energy minister said construction of the conduit could require an investment of as much as $20 billion. "Energy integration cannot be at any cost. It has to be domestically and internationally competitive," said Wagner Victer, energy secretary in Rio de Janeiro state. "It would end up being a Pharaonic work," he said of the proposed pipeline, likening the idea to the project of Brazil's 1964-1985 military government for a trans-Amazon highway to link the sprawling country's northern and southern regions. The road remains unfinished. Victer suggests the pipeline initiative may not go much beyond the dramatic announcement that emerged from last week's talks in Brasília among President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and counterparts Nestor Kirchner of Argentina and Hugo Chavez of Venezuela. "The political decision is important, but without a technical and commercial foundation, it becomes folly or ends in nothing," the state official said. Venezuela's Chavez, a fierce critic of Washington's foreign policy, wants to diversify his country's petroleum exports beyond the United States, which is the Andean nation's biggest customer by far. The proposed pipeline would enable Caracas to export a quantity of natural gas equivalent to an extra 628,930 barrels per day of crude, but at great cost. "The project has been characterized as Pharaonic for its magnitude in physical and financial terms," said one energy expert who preferred to remain anonymous. "No one understands why they don't prefer a cheaper option, such as transporting liquefied natural gas in ships and taking it where it's needed." Many in the sector say that the huge financial and environmental costs make the pipeline difficult to justify. The conduit would have to traverse environmentally sensitive regions of Venezuela and Brazil. Engineers would also face the task of burying the line beneath the basins of great rivers including the Amazon, which is known as the River Sea for its vast breadth. The pipeline's likely route would take it across thousands of kilometers of virgin rainforest in northern Brazil, opening up areas that have until now been protected by their remoteness. From Manaus, capital of the Brazilian state of Amazonas, the conduit would split into two branches: one running south to Rio de Janeiro; the other eastward to Brazil's impoverished northeast. The southern spur would continue from Rio into the Brazilian industrial heartland - linking up in São Paulo with the existing Gasbol pipeline that delivers 30 million cubic meters of Bolivian natural gas to Brazil - and extend from there to Argentina. The big question is whether the pipeline operators can offer the gas at a competitive price and still recoup their hefty costs. EFE obtained a copy of estimates from independent consultants who said that the pipeline operators could not afford to sell their gas for anything less than $8 per million British thermal units. Bolivia currently sells natural gas to Brazil for $3.23 per million BTU, and charges $3.18 per million BTU for gas delivered to the Argentine border. Brazilian prices for domestically produced natural gas are significantly lower. Another factor to be considered is demand, given that 100 million cubic meters a day - the proposed quantity to be transported eventually by the line - is a lot of gas. Right now, Brazil consumes 70 million cubic meters per day, 35 percent of which comes from Bolivia. Argentina, which is far more dependent on natural gas, uses about twice as much as its giant neighbor. Looking ahead to the time when the prospective pipeline would likely be completed, Brazil is expected to be producing more than 3 million barrels per day of crude oil within its borders along with 100 million cubic meters of natural gas. Brazilian state-owned oil company Petrobras vows the country will become self-sufficient in crude sometime this year and expects the same will happen with regard to natural gas within a decade. Petrobras' richest oil and gas fields are located in Atlantic waters off the coasts of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro states, the very places Venezuela hopes to sell its gas. As for Argentina, its demand for Venezuelan fuel might be smaller than expected if Buenos Aires achieves its aim of reviving the country's troubled oil and gas industry and restoring depleted reserves, though the success of that effort is by no means assured. Edmar Fagundes de Almeida, an economics professor at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, says the pipeline initiative is rooted in the political needs of Argentina - now short of natural gas - and of Chavez's Venezuela, "which seeks a high-profile political role in the region." "As an idea, it's appealing, and there is nothing wrong with it," the academic said, but noted that to make the project attractive to the private investors it will need means providing long-term contracts and guarantees. The professor said that creating the necessary incentives will not be easy for Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela, each of which has its own distinctive legal regime governing the energy sector Mercopress - www.mercopress.com
 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area. 
The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy. 
On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil. 
Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms. 
One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis. 
On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking. 
Depletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse. 
Geisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose. 
The push of vigilante groups in Rio de Janeiro's favelas (shantytowns) in the last three years is the most important and alarming information of the just-released study by the Rio de Janeiro University's Violence Research Center (Nupev-Uerj). 
A dispute over drug trafficking territory in Rio de Janeiro has intensified lately, leaving in its wake unprecedented acts of violence, such as the downing of a police helicopter in the northern zone of the city on October 17. Three policemen died and another two were injured. This event has drawn the attention of the international media, who are raising the issue of public security for the 2016 Olympics to be held in Rio.