Brazil - Brazzil Mag - Lula Didn't Sin by Omission in Brazilian Corruption, Inquiry Concludes
Advertisement
  Home arrow News arrow March 2006 arrow Lula Didn't Sin by Omission in Brazilian Corruption, Inquiry Concludes Thursday, 24 July 2008 
Main Menu
Home
News
Back Issues
Advertising
Contact Us
Brazil Forum
Magazine
Brazzil Classic
Yellow Pages
Classifieds
Images
BrazzilMag Newsfeed
Custom Search
Amazon Body Care


Personal Loan | Loans | Just Holden Commodores | Quick Collect | Paper Models
-------------
Brazil /Organic personal skin care wholesale / Brazil
--------------
Who's Online
We have 32 guests online
Latest News
Statistics
Members: 387
News: 9610
Web Links: 0
User Menu
Your Details
Submit News
Check-In My Items
My Comments
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Related Items
Contribution
Have you got news?

Do you have news, comment or story on Brazil you want to share with Brazzil? Just send it our way to brazzil@brazzil.com.

 

Lula Didn't Sin by Omission in Brazilian Corruption, Inquiry Concludes PDF Print E-mail
Written by Marcos Chagas   
Thursday, 30 March 2006

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva cannot be held in any way responsible for the vote-buying scheme investigated by the Joint Parliamentary Investigatory Commission (CPMI) on the Post Office, declares the final report submitted by deputy Osmar Serraglio from the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party.

As he had already been telling the press he would, Serraglio, who was assigned the task of preparing the document for the CPMI, considered the president in his report.

In a chapter entitled "What President Lula Knew," Serraglio refers to sections of testimony in which witnesses, such as former federal deputy, Roberto Jefferson (PTB-RJ), allude to the president's possible awareness of "the involvement of members of the legislature in illegalities that were committed."

Serraglio emphasizes that nothing revealed by the investigations shows any evidence that the president was guilty of any act of omission.

"There is no objective responsibility here on the part of the Commander in Chief of the nation, merely because he sits at the apex of the Executive Power, which would imply holding him responsible whether he had knowledge or not... Nothing suggests that he was guilty of any omission," the rapporteur states.

ABr

Hits: 3615
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

busy




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=
 
< Prev   Next >




Cheap travel to Brazil!