Brazil - Brazzil Mag - Despite US Push, Brazil Says No to UN Mission in Lebanon
Advertisement
  Monday, 09 November 2009 
Main Menu
Home
News
Back Issues
Advertising
Contact Us
Brazil Forum
Magazine
Brazzil Classic
Yellow Pages
Classifieds
Images
BrazzilMag Newsfeed
Custom Search
Amazon Body Care
-------------
Brazil /Organic personal skin care wholesale / Brazil
--------------
Who's Online
We have 194 guests online
Latest News
Statistics
Members: 489
News: 11403
Web Links: 0
User Menu
Your Details
Submit News
Check-In My Items
My Comments
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Most Read
Related Items
Contribution
Have you got news?

Do you have news, comment or story on Brazil you want to share with Brazzil? Just send it our way to brazzil@brazzil.com.

 

Despite US Push, Brazil Says No to UN Mission in Lebanon PDF Print E-mail
Written by Newsroom   
Thursday, 17 August 2006

Brazil has decided not to send troops for the United Nations peace mission in Lebanon, in spite of strong lobbying from the United States, according to the Argentine press.

Talking in Beirut, Brazilian Foreign Minister, Celso Amorim, confirmed Tuesday, August 15, that Brazil will not be part of the UN mission. A few hours later Argentina’s Deputy Foreign Affairs minister Roberto Garcia Moritan made a similar announcement.

Apparently Argentina and Brazil coordinated a common position in the issue in spite of the strong pressure from United States for the integration of troops from the two countries to the peace effort.

Both Brasilia and Buenos Aires assessed that in the event of a participation in Lebanon with forces, political disadvantages were greater than benefits.

Argentina in the last ten years has suffered two major terrorist attacks: one against the Israel embassy in Buenos Aires which was flattened and a second against a local Jewish organization that left hundreds dead and wounded. President Kirchner administration believes that an active involvement, even for peace purposes, could generate further risks, points out the Argentine press.

Brazil on the other hand has at least ten million residents who descend from Lebanese and Syrian immigrants and also a very powerful, in financial terms, Jewish community.

In Beirut Amorim is quoted telling Lebanese Premier Fuaud Siniora that the “Lula administration has no expectations of mediating in a crisis of such nature”.

If the request was in a context of “clear undisputed willingness to peace, we would be present”, pointed out Amorim who arrived in Beirut with nine tons of relief aid, mostly donations from the Lebanese community in Brazil. “One thing is a cease fire, but it's also crucial that dialogue is resumed”, Amorim summed up Brazil's position.

Apparently the Brazilian official was very impressed to see Brazilian flags and colous flying from many of the Israeli bombed quarters in Beirut. Actually the Brazilian Air Force rescued many Lebanese-Brazilians during the month long conflict.

Amorim also made it clear the Lula administration has no intention of debilitating its relations with Israel.

"We want to maintain the good relations with Israel. And we also want to persuade them to resume dialogue because that's where hope lies," emphasized the Brazilian official.

From Chile, another country with significant Middle East and Jewish communities, plus a long record of collaboration with UN peace efforts, the attitude was similar. Chilean military sources said that the Lebanese situation needs hardy proven forces and a solemn commitment from both sides.

“First it’s the duty of countries with high military capability, and then with a stabilized situation, Chile could operate in the zone”.

Hits: 5764
Comments (2)Add Comment
No balls....as usual !
written by CH.C., August 17, 2006
Brazil and South American countries have never ever done something for peace.....unless they get many advantages.
You have been highly critical against Israel......despite it was the Hezbollahs who started all this war !
But now....you retract yourselves and dont want to irritate neither the Muslmims nor the Jews. But none of them would be against a UN peace mission, regardless of the participating countries involved.
You just cover your ass. One day you criticze Israel harshly and the next day......you refuse to participate in the peace UN mission.

You just play a double game with everything you do and say........as usual !
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
Not known to many
written by ABC, August 18, 2006
The dear friend above lack knowledge of history. Firstly Brazil fought the II World War against the nazis in Italy. Not known to many (because of Hollywood continuing expressed preferencialAmerican propaganda) with fiercy battles the Brazilian Army was responsible for the opening of the passage of the Apenines where the Germans had the most important stronghold in Italy. Without the Brazilian victory passage to the North of Italy would be impossible. The Brazilian Forces completed all the missions confided to them and compared favorably with the American divisions of the Fourth Corps. Unfortunately, the heavy symbolism of Monte Castello has obscured the FEB's victory (Brazilian Expeditionary Force) at Montese on April 16, in which it took the town after a four-day gruelling battle, suffering 426 casualties.47 In the next days it fought to a standstill the German 148th Division and Fascist Italian Monte Rosa, San Marco, and Italia Divisions, which surrendered to General Mascarenhas on April 29-30. In a matter of days the Brazilians trapped and took the surrender of 2 generals, 800 officers, and 14,700 troops. The 148th was the only intact German division to surrender on that front.48 Although they had little preparation and served under foreign command, against a combat-experienced enemy, the "Smoking Cobras," as the FEB was nicknamed, had shown, as one of their songs put it, the "fiber of the Brazilian army" and the "grandeza de nossa gente" [greatness of our peoplej.49

American leaders wanted the FEB to stay in Europe as part of the occupation forces, but Brazilian military and civilian leaders rejected that role. Unhappily, over American objections, the Brazilian government decided to disband the FEB upon return to Brazil. The American military had hoped that the division would be kept together to form the nucleus for a complete reformation of the Brazilian army. FEB veterans would slowly introduce the lessons of the war finto the General Staff School and Military School curricula. But the chance to use the FEB experience to project Brazilian influence on the post-war world order was lost. Those making the rapid decisions in late 1945 that led to the FEB's demise could not know how quickly the United States would demobilize, or how quickly the alliance with the Soviet Union would collapse. Perhaps if Brazil had maintained occupation troops in Europe and a standing cadre of combat-hardened troops at home, it would have had a different post-war international position.

Nowadays Brazil is considered one of the countries which more contributes to the UN sending troops n several places.

Should you know more about Brazil?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=
 
< Prev   Next >

Visit Brazzil Social with Video, Music and Chat


BBC Feed
BBC News and Sport Search: brazil
BBC News and Sport Search: brazil