|
 Recent news from media sources would have readers believe that Brazil is euphoric in its corn production. It is true that we are seeing some impressive figures, and never have we exported so much corn. Predictions show that corn production will only increase in 2008.
And according to analyses being done by agribusiness, the expectation is that Brazil will become the biggest exporter of corn in the world.
On the other hand, the scene has never been so sober for family farms and food security. For some time now, big multinational corporations have been investing in and gaining control over the food chain on a global scale. In this strategy, the seed industry holds a key role.
Big corporations have adopted an aggressive policy of acquiring seed companies on all continents, setting up an growing oligarchy in this sector. One example is that of Monsanto, which according to a 2005 report of the ETC Group, controls 41% of the global commerce of corn seed.
In Brazil, it is the same reality. Since the 1990s, multinationals have increased their control of the seed market. Soon after the approval of the Law of Protection for Cultivation in 1997, the multinationals have acquired 22 companies.
And the corn industry in particular has been a preferred target in this offensive, demonstrating very clearly that there exists a situation of oligarchy in this area.
In the last few months, two big multinationals have deepened their involvement in this situation. In August, Dow Agroscience bought out Agromen, which held 10% of the Brazilian corn seed market. In September, Monsanto then announced its acquisition of the corn division of Agroeste. It is estimated that both Dow and Monsanto dolled out US$ 100 million each in these purchases.
With the acquisition of Agromen, Dow now has more than 20% of the corn seed market, while Monsanto increased its participation in the same market to 30%, nearing DuPont/Pioneer, the front-runner with 33%. These three companies along with the Swiss company Syngenta almost totally control the Brazilian seed market.
But they are not ready to stop. Now it seems there is great interest in another Brazilian company, Santa Helena, in the state of Minas Gerais. Christian Pflug, manager of biotechnology and licensing of Monsanto corn left the company's intentions clear in a recent interview in the magazine, Valor Econômico:
"We are going to take every opportunity that comes our way to consolidate our position in the corn seed market, just as we have done in the United States."
One of the reasons for this frantic rush to corn is that it is currently a hot commodity in the international market. The United States announcement of its corn-based ethanol production plan has had a devastating effect on corn sales and its surge in price.
Certainly, other products will rise in price as US farmers abandon other crops in favor of corn for ethanol production. With the high demand for corn, principally in Europe, there has been a huge escalation in price, from US$ 116.60 per ton in July of 2006, to nearly US$ 165 in 2007.
Although Brazil may be a big producer of corn, the crop has never occupied a distinctive place in exports. Until this year, the record for corn export happened in 2001 when 6 million tons were exported. In 2006, 4 million tons were exported. But the high demand has caused a real boom in Brazilian export.
It is estimated that by the end of this year, 8 million tons will be exported, double that of 2006. The favorable performance of corn on the market has generated high expectations. Even the Ministry of Agriculture is now saying that exports will soon reach 10 million tons.
And these expectations are not just limited to short term gains, but will extend themselves over the next 2-3 years when the US plans to substantially increase its ethanol production.
Brasil de Fato
 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Brazil received a huge boost in its international image with its selection as the host of the 2016 Olympics, but it was really just the cherry on top of the overall recognition of the country's ascension to the ranks of one of the world's most important countries. Now, as it finally takes its place on the world scene, there has been a great deal of concern about what kind of image Brazil hopes to project, now that the world is really paying attention. 
The only good thing to say about the visit to Brazil of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, on Monday November 23, is that it was mercifully short and lasted less than 24 hours. Ahmadinejad had his picture taken being hugged by president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva who gave him a warm welcome and said Iran had every right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. 
The small, coastal town of Condé is located just a twenty minute's drive from João Pessoa, the capital of Paraíba. The Northeast of Brazil has historically been a place of encounter and mixing between peoples. For millenia groups of indigenous people fished, farmed, migrated and sometimes fought along this large, fertile area. 
The Brazilian diplo-MÁ-cia (bad diplomacy) carries on its accelerated course towards the non-acknowledgment of human rights, although sometimes it takes pleasure in saying that it does precisely the opposite. The visit of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is another example of a diplomatic omission that verges on hypocrisy. 
On July 4, 2006, representatives of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay met in Caracas to sign the protocol for the entrance of Venezuela into the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). After two and a half years, the protocol was approved by the legislative bodies of Argentina and Uruguay, and as of now it may be only days away from being ratified by the continent's economic megalith, Brazil. 
Some sectors of the fight against AIDS have suggested that Thabo Mbeki, the former president of South Africa, committed genocide through his absence from the fight against the illness in his country throughout his two terms. 
One hundred and eleven years after Brazil abolished slavery, the number of workers deprived of their freedom is still huge. They raise cattle, produce charcoal, sugar cane or timber. Some of them, most undocumented Bolivians, work in basements of small apparel factories in São Paulo and other metropolis. 
On November 7, 2009 a few friends and I had an opportunity to take a look inside a Brazilian jail outside the city of Rio de Janeiro. We were able to take some amateur footage of our experience on video (see link below). It's no surprise, of course, that the typical Brazilian jail lacks some of the functionality of those in North America or Europe, but our experience that day was quite shocking. 
Depletion of the Amazon Rainforest is not a new concern facing environmentalists, biologists, ecologists, and a growing number of the Amazonian indigenous peoples. For decades they have feared for the fate of the world's most biologically diverse and species-rich hothouse. 
Geisy Arruda made history this week in Brazil, but for all the wrong reasons. What began as a poorly planned fashion statement has become a worldwide tale. Geisy decided to wear a pink mini-dress to her private college in São Paulo state, and after that, all hell broke loose.
Correct....or not ?
In the above the 3 U.S. companies control over 83 % of the Brazilian corn market.
Plus whatever share Syngenta has.
As written, foreign companies nearly control ALL of the corn seeds in Brazil.
Correct or not ?
Stupid question to the smart Brazilian junkies in this site : WHAT IS THE MARKET SHARE OF EMBRAPA ????????
Large...or almost NIL ?????
Just another proof and simple demonstration of how Brazilians are cheating, lying and hiding....as usual !
And as I have written in this forum so many times, if one is bullish in Brazilian agriculture, just buy shares of the foreign input suppliers, such as those producing seeds, tractors, harvesters, fertilizers, fongicides and pesticides.
They truly shine because they are also selling worldwide, not only in Brazil.
And your farmers will continue to make little money....AT BEST !
It happens that for soyabeans, for example, in early 2004 when prices were similar than today in US$, the per sac price of soyabeans paid to your farmers was over 60 Reals. Today.....around 35 Reals....because the US$ fell sharply.
On the other hand the input prices have increased sharply......EVEN IN BRAZILIAN REALS !
End results : simple, your farmers (except the large and mega farms) are making far smaller profits if any !!!!!
But they would be starving if they did not/do not purchase the newer seeds and related products, producing far more per hectare than older generations seeds and products !
That is a far away difference from what is told by Bin Lula and his 4000 thieves gang members !
Feel free to ask by yourself directly to a Brazilian farmer.
Ohhh and in the input price increase I have not included yet the increase in diesel prices even in Brazilian currency !!!!!
Allo....allo....allo...anyone there ? I cant hear you ! Where is AES the idiot ??????
Laugh....laugh....laugh...laugh