Brazil - Brazzil Mag - Child Labor and Violence Explain Low School Attendance in Brazil
Advertisement
  Home arrow News arrow August 2008 arrow Child Labor and Violence Explain Low School Attendance in Brazil Friday, 05 December 2008 
Main Menu
Home
News
Back Issues
Advertising
Contact Us
Brazil Forum
Magazine
Brazzil Classic
Yellow Pages
Classifieds
Images
BrazzilMag Newsfeed
Custom Search
Amazon Body Care


Cow Farming | Home Loan | Auto Loans | Problem Mortgage | Hummer Dealer
-------------
Brazil /Organic personal skin care wholesale / Brazil
--------------
Who's Online
We have 432 guests online
Latest News
Statistics
Members: 418
News: 10310
Web Links: 0
User Menu
Your Details
Submit News
Check-In My Items
My Comments
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Related Items
Contribution
Have you got news?

Do you have news, comment or story on Brazil you want to share with Brazzil? Just send it our way to brazzil@brazzil.com.

 

Child Labor and Violence Explain Low School Attendance in Brazil PDF Print E-mail
Written by Newsroom   
Wednesday, 27 August 2008

Rural school in Brazil Brazil's Ministry of Education (MEC) publicized a report revealing the principal causes which led students benefiting from the Bolsa Família (Family Voucher), a program that provides a stipend to families on the condition that their children attend school and be vaccinated, to miss school during the months of February and March of 2008. 

Among the reasons are: illness among the students, negligence of the parents, premature pregnancy, begging, child labor, and domestic violence.  There were 172,452 children and adolescents with low school attendance during this period.

The Brazilian federal government has been monitoring the school attendance of children and adolescents who benefit from the Bolsa Família since 2005.  In 2007, the Ministry added a control whose effectiveness are not yet determined: every time a child registered in the program misses more than 15% of school days, the school has to note the reason for the lack of attendance. 

In this latest report, more than half of these notations are classified as "without an identified motive".  This indicates a problem needing to be solved but there remains doubt over whether the school really does not know why the student is missing or whether the school is simply not interested in reporting it.

São Paulo is the state that leads the ranking with the greatest number of students with low attendance.  There were 54,464 in the first two months of the school year, of which 34,531 were classified as having unidentified motives, and 6,321 were caused by parental negligence. 

In second place was Minas Gerais, with 17,783 recorded, and Ceará was in third place, with 10,844.  The families who do not comply with the minimum required attendance of 85% for students between the ages of 6 and 15 are subjected to sanctions which range from warnings to loss of the stipend.  In February and March of this year, 1.2% of the beneficiaries in this age group had low attendance.

Since 2007, MEC's Secretariat for Continuing Education, Literacy, and Diversity (Secad) has carried out the Projeto Presença, an online system which monitors the causes of student absences.  The system is used by more than 12 thousand people, by school employees and municipal and state secretaries of education who have been trained in all of the country's 5,564 municipalities to operate the system of sending data through the Internet. 

Now, the challenge is to guarantee that the data, with a nominal list of students who are victims of various rights violations, does not merely become another set of statistics.

In accordance with the Law of Directives and Bases of National Education, the control of school attendance is the responsibility of the school.  In spite of these, according to article 56 of the Statute of Children and Adolescents, the directors of elementary schools are obligated to communicate with the Guardianship Council any cases that involve maltreatment of their students, repeated unjustified absences, truancy, and high levels of grade repetition.  However, the lack of preparation of the educational system to deal with these problems make it difficult to fulfill the law.

The MEC is trying to change this reality.  In 2007, the Ministry trained 700 professors to deal, in the classroom, with physical and psychological violence, negligence, sexual exploitation, and child labor. 

The project Schools Which Protect received an investment of 3.7 million Brazilian reais (US$ 2.3 million) in 2007.  In 2008, the budget projected 6.5 million reais (US$ 4 million), but up to the end of the first semester, nothing was spent and there is still no word on when the program will be re-instituted.

Adital

Hits: 1549
Comments (5)Add Comment
Child labor ?????
written by ch.c., August 28, 2008
Has Bin the Crook not said this was eliminated ?
And stats in the article simply cant be correct for the simple reason there are several millions children working in Brazil and at least a million of street children.
Therefore they are NOT IN SCHOOL !!!!!

Simple demonstration how cheaters and liars continue to cheat and lie on a daily basis !
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
It´s Very Simple
written by Ric, August 30, 2008
Make truancy (playing hooky, or hookey) a crime. In most civilized societies it already is.

While you are at it, make jaywalking a crime. Protect the kids on their way to school.



report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by João da Silva, August 30, 2008
While you are at it, make jaywalking a crime


"Jaywalking" ? I had almost forgotten this word. Thanks for refreshing my memory!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Ric, August 31, 2008
Yes, certainly. In California it´s no joke. In the last 50 miles south to the Mexican border on Hiway 101, there are illustrated signs warning motorists of people running across the highway. Those signs show a man, a woman, and a kid, I think. Portraying the dear Mexican people. Evidently jaywalking is common among the common people of Latin America. But in California a driver is required by law to come to a halt, screeching or otherwise, whether on the highway or on a city street, to let pedestrians cross to the other side unmolested.

The fine for jaywalking for an adult in California is over $100, up to over $130. Whether illegals are ticketed, I don´t know.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by João da Silva, August 31, 2008
Evidently jaywalking is common among the common people of Latin America.


I think the reason is that not many motorists (except idiots like me) care to stop at a pedestrian Crossing to let the people cross the street. It is therefore safer to jaywalk and cross the road between two intersections, after ensuring that the traffic is clear on both sides. I don't know how it is in the city where you live, but here the most dangerous ones are the motor cyclists who neither obey the traffic lights nor the pedestrian X-sings. Recently, I started observing that even the Cop cars also do not stop for the pedestrians!

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=
 
< Prev   Next >